<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" > <channel> <title>Ultra Sports Bet &#187; st.-louis-rams</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/tag/st-louis-rams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com</link> <description>Information, advice and news about sports betting.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item> <title>Week 6 in the NFL is here already</title> <link>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/10/32/</link> <comments>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/10/32/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:52:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Selections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[baltimore-ravens]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cincinnati-bengals]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cleveland-browns]]></category> <category><![CDATA[green-bay-packers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[kansas-city-chiefs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[miami-dolphins]]></category> <category><![CDATA[new-orleans-saints]]></category> <category><![CDATA[seattle-seahawks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[st.-louis-rams]]></category> <category><![CDATA[washington-redskins]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/32/</guid> <description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s only one game that everyone is talking about this week &#8211; New England at Dallas. Though I won&#8217;t be making a pick on the game because I don&#8217;t see a lot of value in the line, there is one thing I would be willing to bet on &#8211; one way or the other the game is going to be a disappointment that doesn&#8217;t come close to living up to the hype. There are, on the other hand, five games that do have some value in them. I obviously am not nostalgic about the concept of home this week because [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s only one game that everyone is talking about this week &#8211; New England at Dallas. Though I won&#8217;t be making a pick on the game because I don&#8217;t see a lot of value in the line, there is one thing I would be willing to bet on &#8211; one way or the other the game is going to be a disappointment that doesn&#8217;t come close to living up to the hype. There are, on the other hand, five games that do have some value in them. I obviously am not nostalgic about the concept of home this week because four of the five teams I picked are on the road. Here&#8217;s a look:</p> <p><strong><em> Cincinnati (-1) at Kansas City</em></strong> &#8211; Neither of these teams have been very good at all, but the difference is that one of them should be. For the first half of the season I sometimes revert to a mental game to help me look at games like this &#8211; on a neutral field before the season started who would have been favored in this game? The answer, in my mind, would be Cincinnati in a cake walk. That makes them attractive to me here. The Kansas City secondary has mostly been solid, and they have a highly rated pass defense (#5), but they haven&#8217;t met a passing game with anywhere near the potential of the Bengals. If it gets to be a shootout, which it could because the Bengals haven&#8217;t exactly been able to stop anyone, then I like Carson Palmer over Damon Huard every time. <strong>Pick:</strong> Cincinnati.</p> <p><em><strong> St. Louis (+9.5) at Baltimore</strong></em> &#8211; I don&#8217;t like the Rams at all, but I don&#8217;t understand what the Ravens have done to justify being favored by this much. They have won their games by 2, 3, and 7 points this year, and they have yet to cover a spread. Again, I am not suggesting that the Rams are a good team, but they certainly have the potential to be better than they have been up to this point, and I think that this line compensates more for the worst case scenario then it does for a likely reality. <strong>Pick:</strong> St. Louis.</p> <p><em><strong> New Orleans (+7) at Seattle</strong></em> &#8211; I don&#8217;t want you to think that I am picking the Saints because they are due or something ridiculous. I am going with the Saints, but it&#8217;s because I think that there is a world of value in this line. Seattle&#8217;s running game is unsettled with Shaun Alexander out and Mack Strong newly retired. That means that the game could turn into a shootout and, despite the evidence of this year so far, I think that New Orleans can fare well enough to stay close in that kind of game. On paper they certainly should. Seattle has not looked like an inspired, committed team this year, and this could be a good spot for a hungry, embarrassed New Orleans team to try to right the ship. <strong>Pick:</strong> New Orleans.</p> <p><em><strong> Washington (+3.5) at Green Bay</strong></em> &#8211; The Chicago defense isn&#8217;t at its best this year, yet it was able last week to force the Packers to get conservative in the second half, and that limited them to just three points and caused them to lose. Washington has a secondary that very good, and it managed to completely shut down the Detroit passing offense last week. Washington QB Jason Campbell was very efficient and effective last week, and he could do that again if he can find the time. If that happens I think that Green Bay, which has been playing well but certainly over their heads compared to preseason expectations, could struggle to stay well ahead of the Redskins. That make this line, where a field goal loss for Washington is still a win, attractive to me. <strong>Pick:</strong> Washington.<br /> <em><strong><br /> Miami (+3.5) at Cleveland</strong></em> &#8211; The Dolphins are a really, really bad team. Not only that, but they have to face life with Cleo Lemon as their starter, and with Ronnie Brown and Jason Taylor hurting. Cleveland is a better team than many would expect, and this is the kind of game, with a struggling team visiting them, where they could really be tasting blood. Coach Romeo Crennel will be looking to recapture momentum after the New England loss and before the bye week. It also needs to be noted that Cleveland played a lot better against New England than the score would indicate. They had Tom Brady looking unsettled much more than any other team has, and they held the Pats scoreless for more than 20 minutes. <strong>Pick:</strong> Cleveland.</p> <p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> The week started badly when I misread both St. Louis and Cincinnati and gave them both significantly more credit than they obviously deserve. Those are two bad, bad teams. Thankfully it settled down nicely after that. New Orleans finally looked like New Orleans, Cleveland was as impressive as they needed to be thanks to some incredible chemistry between Derek Anderson and Braylon Edwards, and Washington was able to hold on to lose by few enough points to keep me in the game. All in all, it was a 3-2 week that I&#8217;m not complaining about.</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/10/32/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>