<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" > <channel> <title>Ultra Sports Bet &#187; patriots</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/tag/patriots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com</link> <description>Information, advice and news about sports betting.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item> <title>10 reasons I am going to hate this Super Bowl</title> <link>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2008/01/10-reasons-i-am-going-to-hate-this-super-bowl/</link> <comments>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2008/01/10-reasons-i-am-going-to-hate-this-super-bowl/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:28:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[giants]]></category> <category><![CDATA[new-england]]></category> <category><![CDATA[new-york]]></category> <category><![CDATA[patriots]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/10-reasons-i-am-going-to-hate-this-super-bowl/</guid> <description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re going to be talking about the Super Bowl a lot over the next two weeks. After all, it is the biggest sports betting event of the year, and sports betting is what we are all about. Let&#8217;s get started. I have to admit that I am not that excited about this match-up. Okay, I hate it. Here&#8217;s why: 1. Inevitability &#8211; In the dictionary under inevitable it says &#8216;Patriots win 2008 Super Bowl&#8217;. I like sports for the drama, and I see about as much drama in this as in an elementary school production of Cats. 2. Eli Manning [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re going to be talking about the Super Bowl a lot over the next two weeks. After all, it is the biggest sports betting event of the year, and sports betting is what we are all about. Let&#8217;s get started. I have to admit that I am not that excited about this match-up. Okay, I hate it. Here&#8217;s why:</p> <p><strong> 1. Inevitability</strong> &#8211; In the dictionary under inevitable it says &#8216;Patriots win 2008 Super Bowl&#8217;. I like sports for the drama, and I see about as much drama in this as in an elementary school production of Cats.</p> <p><strong> 2. Eli Manning</strong> &#8211; I freaking hate this guy. I live in dread of the thought that I will have to spend the next two weeks listening to how this guy has matured and led this team to the promised land. They&#8217;ll miss the fact that he is still only barely above average as a QB, and that the Giants follow a long line of teams that got to the big game only because their QB made fewer mistakes than the other guys. Eli didn&#8217;t win those games for his team &#8211; he just didn&#8217;t lose them.</p> <p><strong> 3. The rest of the Mannings</strong> &#8211; The royal family of football make me so sick I might choke on my Oreo. The coverage of their every move was mind-numbing enough when three of them had played in the NFL. Now that two of them have made the Super Bowl it will be the most nauseating thing I have been subjected to since we all got to learn Jerome Bettis was from Detroit every three seconds for two weeks before the Super Bowl was played there.</p> <p><strong> 4. Glendale, Arizona</strong> &#8211; The new home of the Arizona Cardinals is a beautiful stadium, but it is located in the heart of suburban hell. One huge mall full of massive, soulless stores is right beside another, covering miles and miles of desert wasteland. I&#8217;m not going to the game and frankly I&#8217;m glad. A guy can only handle so many Target stores.<br /> <strong><br /> 5. Brett Favre isn&#8217;t there</strong> &#8211; Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I&#8217;m not a big Favre fan or a Green Bay backer. I just know that we are going to be subjected to endless speculation about the playing future of the ageless one, and if he made the Super Bowl the whole thing could have been held off for two more blissful weeks.</p> <p><strong> 6. The coaches</strong> &#8211; Tom Coughlin is good at his job, and Bill Belichick is a coaching ninja. The problem, though, is that they have the combined personality of a sheet of plywood. They won&#8217;t say anything interesting, and they won&#8217;t let their players say much, either. This will be two weeks of misdirection and doublespeak.</p> <p><strong> 7. The spread</strong> &#8211; The Super Bowl is supposed to be the ultimate showdown of the two best teams in the world. The two best teams would not have an opening spread of two touchdowns. Spreads that big are the ones I ignore on principle in the regular season, but now its the only game in town.</p> <p><strong> 8. Deja vu</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen this game before a month ago and it wasn&#8217;t that interesting then. The Giants played well but ultimately showed that they just weren&#8217;t good enough. That time they were on their home field. Now they have to travel and play against the most focused team in the history of sports. I don&#8217;t see why I should believe that this game is going to be closer or more interesting.</p> <p><strong> 9. Tom Brady as God</strong> &#8211; Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love Brady as I do every former Michigan player. He is the best quarterback in the league in my books, and with all due respect to Eli&#8217;s big brother I don&#8217;t think it is particularly close. Despite that, the talk of Brady&#8217;s brilliance over the next two weeks will be enough to make me puke. Reporters will be tripping over themselves to find metaphors to describe their man-crushes and there will be no escaping it.</p> <p><strong> 10. No Shockey</strong> &#8211; Jeremy Shockey is the only guy on either team that could have been relied on to really do something truly stupid in the lead up to the game. With him out of action the chances of a total meltdown are low. Where&#8217;s the fun in that?</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2008/01/10-reasons-i-am-going-to-hate-this-super-bowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Wow!</title> <link>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/12/wow/</link> <comments>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/12/wow/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:21:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[jets]]></category> <category><![CDATA[patriots]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/wow/</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Patriots opened as 27 point favorites against the Jets. That&#8217;s ridiculous. It&#8217;s especially ridiculous that it&#8217;s hard to make a solid case for the underdog in the game with the biggest NFL spread in history. Hopefully it goes without saying by now, but I won&#8217;t be betting on this game. Post from: Ultra Sports Bet <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Patriots opened as 27 point favorites against the Jets. That&#8217;s ridiculous. It&#8217;s especially ridiculous that it&#8217;s hard to make a solid case for the underdog in the game with the biggest NFL spread in history. Hopefully it goes without saying by now, but I won&#8217;t be betting on this game.</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/12/wow/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>The Game</title> <link>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/11/the-game/</link> <comments>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/11/the-game/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:00:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Selections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[colts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[indianapolis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[new-england]]></category> <category><![CDATA[patriots]]></category> <category><![CDATA[picks]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/the-game/</guid> <description><![CDATA[ New England (-5) at Indianapolis &#8211; Normally I wouldn&#8217;t touch this game. Having the defending Super Bowl champs, who are undefeated after seven weeks, as five point underdogs at home is way too bizarre to have anything to do with. Since this game is the only thing that anyone is talking about, though, I figure I had better wade right into it. Despite the odd line, I like New England. I have six reasons: Marvin Harrison, if he plays, isn&#8217;t at full health. Manning hasn&#8217;t developed a relationship with another receiver that comes close to replacing that. Manning hasn&#8217;t been [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://b5media_b4.s3.amazonaws.com/68/files/2007/11/pats.gif" alt="pats.gif" /></p> <p><em><strong>New England (-5) at Indianapolis</strong></em> &#8211; Normally I wouldn&#8217;t touch this game. Having the defending Super Bowl champs, who are undefeated after seven weeks, as five point underdogs at home is way too bizarre to have anything to do with. Since this game is the only thing that anyone is talking about, though, I figure I had better wade right into it. Despite the odd line, I like New England. I have six reasons:</p> <ol> <li> Marvin Harrison, if he plays, isn&#8217;t at full health. Manning hasn&#8217;t developed a relationship with another receiver that comes close to replacing that.</li> <li> Manning hasn&#8217;t been as sharp in recent weeks as he can be. Harrison&#8217;s absence is part, but not all, of that. His completion percentage is low at times, and he has looked off somehow.</li> <li> Indy&#8217;s defense is good, but they don&#8217;t have the depth to contain New England&#8217;s three stellar receivers, along with a good tight end and a passable run game.</li> <li> New England is playing with a ferociousness and determination which isn&#8217;t an act. They have lost three in a row to Indy, and I am sure that they will be out to avenge those losses.</li> <li> Tom Brady is playing as well as a quarterback can play.</li> <li> I hate Indianapolis.</li> </ol> <p>This should be a heck of a game and I can&#8217;t wait to watch it. I have a feeling that, which ever team comes out ahead, it isn&#8217;t going to be close. <strong>Pick: </strong>New England.</p> <p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> The game went close to how I hoped, but just not quite enough. The Colts defensive depth was eventually a problem, and Manning missed his key personnel, but the team held on for longer than I was hoping. We did learn a couple of things &#8211; Manning relies heavily on Harrison, and the Pats are really, really, good. Those last nine minutes, especially since they were played in a hostile road environment, were incredible. It was a great game, but there was a good reason I had no interest in betting on it &#8211; way too many variables when teams that good face off.</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/11/the-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item> <title>Tuesday quick hits</title> <link>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/10/tuesday-quick-hits/</link> <comments>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/10/tuesday-quick-hits/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:02:56 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[boston]]></category> <category><![CDATA[carmona]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cowboys]]></category> <category><![CDATA[curt_schilling]]></category> <category><![CDATA[david_carr]]></category> <category><![CDATA[jake_delhomme]]></category> <category><![CDATA[kurt_warner]]></category> <category><![CDATA[matt_leinart]]></category> <category><![CDATA[patriots]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tim_rattay]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/tuesday-quick-hits/</guid> <description><![CDATA[ There should be a brief period of calm, but it is going to be very interesting to watch how the Yankees act this offseason. I expect it to be dramatic. Out with the A-Rod and in with the pitchers who can actually get an out would be a good place to start. Betting on this team is going to be a very different proposition next year. The public is overwhelmingly(87% of bets) on the Patriots in their game against the Cowboys on Sunday. I wonder what the bet split would have been if Dallas hadn&#8217;t have had such a rough Monday [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul> <li>There should be a brief period of calm, but it is going to be very interesting to watch how the Yankees act this offseason. I expect it to be dramatic. Out with the A-Rod and in with the pitchers who can actually get an out would be a good place to start. Betting on this team is going to be a very different proposition next year.</li> <li>The public is overwhelmingly(87% of bets) on the Patriots in their game against the Cowboys on Sunday. I wonder what the bet split would have been if Dallas hadn&#8217;t have had such a rough Monday night? If you believe in mulligans then this could be value for Dallas.</li> <li>Matt Leinart is out for the season and Tim Rattay was signed as backup in Arizona. So much for that two quarterback system that was working so well. If Kurt Warner were to get hurt in the next couple of weeks it could get ugly. With him, though, I think the offense is actually more attractive than it was before.</li> <li>Jake Delhomme has opted for season ending surgery, and David Carr has a sore back. Speaking of ugly situations.</li> <li>Interesting move by Boston to use the break between series to switch their rotation around. Dice-K is now third and Curt Schilling moves up to second. It gives the Japanese rookie a much softer match up (Westbrook instead of Carmona), and puts Schilling in the power spot that&#8217;s good for his ego. I still think Boston has a pitching edge, but the gap is narrower now.</li> <li>Not to blatantly self-promote, but <a href="http://www.docsports.com/2007/a-to-z-40.html" target="_blank">here&#8217;s</a> a weekly column I write that I like doing.</li> </ul> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2007/10/tuesday-quick-hits/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
