<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" > <channel> <title>Ultra Sports Bet &#187; afc-championship</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/tag/afc-championship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com</link> <description>Information, advice and news about sports betting.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item> <title>AFC Championship</title> <link>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2008/01/afc-championship/</link> <comments>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2008/01/afc-championship/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:06:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Selections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[afc-championship]]></category> <category><![CDATA[new england patriots]]></category> <category><![CDATA[picks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[san-diego-chargers]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/afc-championship/</guid> <description><![CDATA[ San Diego (+14.5) at New England &#8211; I said it earlier in the week, and I am going to stick by it &#8211; I&#8217;m taking the Chargers. They are probably outclassed, and injuries will hurt, but two touchdowns is  a pretty big cushion, and I am more confident in their ability to keep it close than I am in the Pats to run away with it. I don&#8217;t see how New England won&#8217;t win, but San Diego is the choice here. Pick: San Diego. Incidentally, as I suspected on Friday, the public seems to be jumping onto the Pats&#8217; bandwagon with [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://b5media_b4.s3.amazonaws.com/68/files/2008/01/chargers.gif" alt="San Diego Chargers" /></p> <p><em><strong>San Diego (+14.5) at New England</strong></em> &#8211; I said it <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/looking-ahead-to-sunday/" target="_blank">earlier in the week</a>, and I am going to stick by it &#8211; I&#8217;m taking the Chargers. They are probably outclassed, and injuries will hurt, but two touchdowns is  a pretty big cushion, and I am more confident in their ability to keep it close than I am in the Pats to run away with it. I don&#8217;t see how New England won&#8217;t win, but San Diego is the choice here. <strong>Pick:</strong> San Diego.</p> <p>Incidentally, <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/surprising-public-action-for-sundays-early-game/" target="_blank">as I suspected on Friday</a>, the public seems to be jumping onto the Pats&#8217; bandwagon with more authority. Their support has jumped from 48 percent to 54 in just over a day.</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.ultrasportsbet.com">Ultra Sports Bet</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultrasportsbet.com/2008/01/afc-championship/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>